TYPES OF NEGOTIATION
There are 7 types of negotiations. It's
important to consider which type you're facing —
each demands a different strategy.
1. Win-Lose Negotiations
In game theory they call a win-lose
negotiation a zero-sum game.
The vast majority of games are zero-sum.
A common analogy for a zero-sum game is dividing a pie. The pie doesn't get smaller or bigger — the players play a game to decide who gets the bigger slice.
If you're facing a win-lose negotiation focus your strategy on determining the other party's minimum requirements (e.g. bottom price).
The vast majority of games are zero-sum.
A common analogy for a zero-sum game is dividing a pie. The pie doesn't get smaller or bigger — the players play a game to decide who gets the bigger slice.
If you're facing a win-lose negotiation focus your strategy on determining the other party's minimum requirements (e.g. bottom price).
2. Win-Win Negotiations
Win-win negotiations involve expanding
the pie. For example, if two people decide to go into business together: their
partnership negotiations are win-win. One
partner may win and the other may lose. However, a win-win outcome is possible
because they hope to make money on their investment (expand the pie). Salary negotiations and business-to-business sales can
usually be considered win-win. Win-win negotiations
may be just as focused on building a bigger pie as dividing the pie fairly.
Every effort should be made to keep negotiations friendly and constructive.
3. Lose-Lose
Lose-Lose negotiations involve a
situation in which everyone is going to lose.
Lawsuits are often lose-lose. Let's say you leave your jacket at a restaurant coat-check and they lose it. Your negotiations for compensation with the restaurant's manager are lose-lose. Your not likely to get more money than the coat was worth. The restaurant also loses.
Lose-lose negotiations can quickly turn bitter and adversarial. Despite the fact that both parties will lose it's important to try to maintain a collaborative approach.
Lawsuits are often lose-lose. Let's say you leave your jacket at a restaurant coat-check and they lose it. Your negotiations for compensation with the restaurant's manager are lose-lose. Your not likely to get more money than the coat was worth. The restaurant also loses.
Lose-lose negotiations can quickly turn bitter and adversarial. Despite the fact that both parties will lose it's important to try to maintain a collaborative approach.
4. Adversarial Negotiations
Adversarial negotiations are highly
competitive in nature.
Win-lose and lose-lose negotiations are most likely to be adversarial. Nobody wants to lose, this tends to drive intense competition.
In some cases, win-win negotiations are also adversarial. For example, high stakes business-to-business sales negotiations often become adversarial (customer vs seller). In extreme cases, negotiations are adversarial because the parties involved intensely dislike each other. In such cases, negotiators may not be interested in winning. Instead, they may seek to maximize the losses of the other party. Negotiations between political rivals may turn destructive in this way. Adversarial negotiations require battle strategies.
Win-lose and lose-lose negotiations are most likely to be adversarial. Nobody wants to lose, this tends to drive intense competition.
In some cases, win-win negotiations are also adversarial. For example, high stakes business-to-business sales negotiations often become adversarial (customer vs seller). In extreme cases, negotiations are adversarial because the parties involved intensely dislike each other. In such cases, negotiators may not be interested in winning. Instead, they may seek to maximize the losses of the other party. Negotiations between political rivals may turn destructive in this way. Adversarial negotiations require battle strategies.
5. Collaborative Negotiations
Collaborative negotiations are creative
and friendly. For example, business partnership negotiations are often
collaborative. Win-win negotiations that are expected to yield big wins tend to
be collaborative. Collaborative negotiations rely on
persuasive techniques, optimism and creativity.
6. Multi-Party Negotiations
Multi-Party negotiations are complex
negotiations between two or more parties. They can be extremely challenging and
may take years to complete. International treaties
between nations are often multi-party.
Multi-party negotiations require advanced diplomatic techniques.
Multi-party negotiations require advanced diplomatic techniques.
7. Bad Faith Negotiation
Bad faith negotiation
occurs when a party makes commitments that they have no intention of keeping. Bad faith negotiation
is often used as a delay or diversionary tactic. For example, a country may
sign an environmental treaty with no intention of implementing it just to
relieve political pressure from its citizens. If you suspect that the other side is
negotiating in bad faith, it's time to start thinking about penalties in your
agreement.
HOW
TO PREPARE NEGOTIATION
While many individuals feel as if successful negotiations are
simply the product of natural skill, the key behind reaching an optimal
agreement is preparation - know
the issue, know yourself, and know your party. Preparation includes knowing
your needs and limits, understanding what the other party wants and
anticipating their limits, asking the right questions, and being creative in
your proposed solutions. Good preparation allows you to strategize and to think
on your feet in the negotiation room.
First,
consider both your interests and the other party's interests. Interests are not
positions. Interests are merely the reasons behind a position. Your interests
in reaching an agreement may be readily apparent to you. However, the other
party's interests may not. Try to put yourself in their shoes. Why did they
agree to sit down at the table with you? What will they get out of this
agreement? After you devise a list of interests, circle the common interests.
You will highlight these shared interests at the negotiation. Starting off a
negotiation on the same page creates a foundation for agreement down the road.
It also creates a sense of mutual understanding at the table and opens lines of
communication. A good agreement fulfills interests, not positions.
Second,
brainstorm options for the agreement. Not every agreement involves just a
black-and-white agreement on a monetary amount. How can you create value? What
options create value for both parties? For example, if you are negotiating an
employment contract with a new employee, think outside salary. Options can
include benefits such as health care and paid time off, training, trade
association memberships, telecommuting, and more. Options create value and help
fulfill even more shared interests.
Third,
consider how you can add legitimacy to these options. What objective criteria
or standards create a sense of fairness in the transaction? This dissolves a
sense of arbitrariness from negotiations. For instance, if you are negotiating
on a real estate purchase, you can use property appraisals or recent sales as
objective criteria.
There are several different formats and styles of
negotiations, and which one you use depends on a host of factors such as the
strength of the relationship, the urgency of the situation, the complexity of
the issues, and the content of the negotiation. Each format and style has its
own strengths and weaknesses and can be strategically used in various types of
situations. While positioned bargaining may be adequate for quick and informal
negotiations such as price haggling, principled negotiations provide a sound
backdrop for successful agreements that add value to both parties by fulfilling
mutual interests. In addition, the five different negotiation styles
(competing, accommodating, avoiding, compromising, and collaborating) are
appropriate in different situations, though the collaborative style is
universally recommended for principled negotiation as it helps increase value.
Finally, preparation is a key element of a successful negotiation, and
specifically the Seven Elements can serve as a strong foundation for
comprehensive preparation and strategizing.
SOURCE :
http://www.acc.com/legalresources/quickcounsel/ensp.cfm
http://training.simplicable.com/training/new/7-types-of-negotiation-and-1-big-myth
Komentar
Posting Komentar